Quantcast
Channel: Smiley Smile Message Board
Viewing all 49813 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Brian Wilson - 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Murphy's, California September 14th, is cancelled...scheduling conflict.

The venue's Facebook page does indeed mention this is canceled. I've removed it from the top post schedule. Curious whose "change in scheduling" it is.

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
To further confuse things concerning the "Postcards" album, when it was recently put back up on Spotify and other streaming services, the version of the album included is the later 2012 version of the album, but *without* the stuff listed as "bonus tracks" on that 2012 version. So it includes "California Dreamin'", which wasn't on the 2010 version of the album but was included within the "album" portion of the 2012 version. But it doesn't include any of the other additional tracks (so no version of "Waves of Love", nor the Pirate version of "Sloop" or the Japan-exclusive "Eternal Ballad.") I would guess this is the track lineup on the recent vinyl reissue as well.

That the album now exists sans "Waves of Love" in any form would also tend to support that the "Waves" track Dvoskin posted about "finishing" with Al very recently is almost certainly yet another rejiggered version of "Waves of Love."

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Cool pics. Looks like Rob B is in for Brian E.

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Myonlysunshine -- where DID you get that awesome Wild Honey hoodie?


A company called “3D royal tees” made and sold them for a limited time last year. Unfortunately they are not available anymore, but I’ve seen some of these hoodies pop up for sale on eBay since then. Along with Wild Honey they made hoodies in this same style using the Friends, Surf’s Up, Smiley Smile, Endless Summer, Love You, and Keepin’ the Summer Alive album artwork.

Maybe Mike Was wondering if the license fee was being paid :D

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Myonlysunshine -- where DID you get that awesome Wild Honey hoodie?


A company called “3D royal tees” made and sold them for a limited time last year. Unfortunately they are not available anymore, but I’ve seen some of these hoodies pop up for sale on eBay since then. Along with Wild Honey they made hoodies in this same style using the Friends, Surf’s Up, Smiley Smile, Endless Summer, Love You, and Keepin’ the Summer Alive album artwork.

Maybe Mike Was wondering if the license fee was being paid :D

Probably. I always assumed that was the reason they weren’t available for very long.

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Based on quick googling, it kind of looks like whatever those album-themed hoodies were, they may well have not been licensed. Might be one of those outfits that churns out clothing and posters and other wears and operates mostly out of Facebook and pays for sponsored posts and all of that. I see Beatles stuff all the time that obviously isn't licensed.

What a weird era. Stuff gets pulled off YouTube and eBay all the time, yet bootleg clothing with conspicuous advertising on social media goes unchecked? Those hoodies look cool, but I'd rather BRI send their online team after *that* stuff instead of having old blurry VHS rips of the Beach Boys on the Merv Griffin Show pulled.

Re: Salesman 1967: Craig Smith, Mike Nesmith, and Mike Love...and Brian?

$
0
0
There is a funny anecdote recounted by a brief acquaintance of Craig's where he and Craig were at a laundromat around 1969 I believe and Mike Love pulls up in a white hearse and takes them for a perilous ride. The mental image of Mike in all white and a cowboy hat in a white hearse driving to TM class and health food restaurants in late 60s LA makes me like him a lot more lol

What we know...generically...is that Mike was a much wilder and "hipper" guy in the 1968-73 time frame than he would currently care to admit, and that much of what he was doing in those days was probably motivated by trying to get back to some form of the original "arrangement" of the band, where he was more centrally involved in the creative decisions. It seems as though he was throwing stuff up against the wall to see what would stick throughout this period, doing whatever he could not to get run over by the creative freight train that was built and being operated by Carl and Dennis. That helps to explain the hostility and pushback against Jack Reiley, who'd sized things up in late 1970 that it was the Wilson brothers who were the prime movers of what he wanted to achieve with the group.

"Salesman" may have been something that Mike seized upon as a way to get a "leg up" with Brian as they came down the home stretch of the SURF's UP sessions, but that never materialized. It sounds as though he was hoping it might fit into a "dreamier" second side of the LP, somehow dovetailing with "Feel Flows" (which prominently features Charles Lloyd). Getting a cover song onto a Beach Boys LP, however, was a tricky proposition: aside from 20/20, which was a grab-bag of material tossed together, these were few and far between.

We are getting a better sense of the wider net cast by the band as the details of this reaching beyond its internal "creative combustion" continue to emerge, and this appears to be another oddball manifestation of that effort. Some kind of weeding out process was taking place during the first year of Reiley's tenure as "guidance guru," and the fur was flying. It eventually came to pass that Carl's approach prevailed--ironically "aided" by Dennis' hand injury, which tipped the scales toward adding Blondie and Ricky. We have yet to hear the exact details of how that process went down, but the decision clearly came about in stages--and Mike's casting about for material such as "Salesman" fits into what was clearly a volatile situation surrounding the band in the SURF'S UP/SO TOUGH era.

Re: An Autobiography by Don Goldberg

$
0
0
Any interesting/rare pictures in it?

Re: An Autobiography by Don Goldberg

$
0
0
What was going on in the time frame between the documented sessions for SO TOUGH has got to be pretty fraught, what with all these folks doing separate things and some kind of internecine warfare afoot, leading to Bruce's departure and the official inclusion of Blondie and Ricky. It seemed that Carl wound up making the final decisions on all this; his closeness with the Flame, coupled with Dennis' hand injury, would seem to be the decisive factors in all that. Having not yet read Goldberg's book, I don't know if there is anything there beyond the surreptitious "side door" effort to get "In the Country" onto SO TOUGH, but I'd doubt anyone was ready to actually put him into the band.

We could certainly use a much more comprehensive glimpse at what went down in the winter of 1971 through the spring of 1972--a LOT of stuff went down in that time frame, and the sequence of events and specific issues involved remain pretty murky...

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
Confirmed regarding Middle Of Nowhere...it's on the Dennis Wilson Its About Time tribute put out by ESQ.

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
To further confuse things concerning the "Postcards" album, when it was recently put back up on Spotify and other streaming services, the version of the album included is the later 2012 version of the album, but *without* the stuff listed as "bonus tracks" on that 2012 version. So it includes "California Dreamin'", which wasn't on the 2010 version of the album but was included within the "album" portion of the 2012 version. But it doesn't include any of the other additional tracks (so no version of "Waves of Love", nor the Pirate version of "Sloop" or the Japan-exclusive "Eternal Ballad.") I would guess this is the track lineup on the recent vinyl reissue as well.

That the album now exists sans "Waves of Love" in any form would also tend to support that the "Waves" track Dvoskin posted about "finishing" with Al very recently is almost certainly yet another rejiggered version of "Waves of Love."

What is it with Al Jardine-produced content and the complete lack of properly cataloging final mixes/tracklistings? This almost reminds of me of the MIU 1990 CD release kerfuffle with *multiple* wrong mixes used.

Or is Al subtly trying to create his own underground SMiLE-esque legend where fans will for years be trying to "roll their own" mixes based out of many alternate versions?  LOL

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
To further confuse things concerning the "Postcards" album, when it was recently put back up on Spotify and other streaming services, the version of the album included is the later 2012 version of the album, but *without* the stuff listed as "bonus tracks" on that 2012 version. So it includes "California Dreamin'", which wasn't on the 2010 version of the album but was included within the "album" portion of the 2012 version. But it doesn't include any of the other additional tracks (so no version of "Waves of Love", nor the Pirate version of "Sloop" or the Japan-exclusive "Eternal Ballad.") I would guess this is the track lineup on the recent vinyl reissue as well.

That the album now exists sans "Waves of Love" in any form would also tend to support that the "Waves" track Dvoskin posted about "finishing" with Al very recently is almost certainly yet another rejiggered version of "Waves of Love."

What is it with Al Jardine-produced content and the complete lack of properly cataloging final mixes/tracklistings? This almost reminds of me of the MIU 1990 CD release kerfuffle with *multiple* wrong mixes used.

Or is Al subtly trying to create his own underground SMiLE-esque legend where fans will for years be trying to "roll their own" mixes based out of many alternate versions?  LOL

The “MIU” CD kerfuffle ended up benefitting fans in that we got a few rare mixes, including a *very* different “Come Go With Me”, a subtle but arguably slightly better alternate mix of “Winds of Change”, and I honestly can’t remember the differences on “Peggy Sue.” But that was all out of Al’s hands; I think the band had little to do with any of the 1990 CDs, in terms of hands-on input. Brian obviously was involved to some degree in the 60s twofers, at least to participating in written intros. But I think those Caribou CDs of the 70s and 80s stuff were kind of just rattled off pretty quickly. I recall someone mentioning years ago that Steve Desper was involved in those, but I’m not sure.

As for Al overly-fixating on stuff, that’s just his jam apparently. What’s even more perplexing is that he takes eons to finish certain things, but then once it gets put out, we get like 27 versions of it. “Loop De Loop” went unreleased for 30 years, then Al finished it in 1998 for the EH Soundtrack. So then we immediately got two variations of it, with “Sail Plane Song” being the template for it. Then we got *another* variation later in 1998 when “Santa’s Got an Airplane” was issued on “Ultimate Christmas.” Then, in 2000, I think “Sail Plane Song” was slightly edited or remixed for the 2000 reissue of the EH Soundtrack CD (I could be mistaken on that one; it’s been a long time). “Sail Plane Song” also got another remix in 2012 for the MIC set. Granted, only two of these happened at the hands of Al specifically.

At least when Al issued “PT Cruiser” as a CD single, he just stuck all five mixes of it on one CD in one go.

Back in 2001, Al issued “California Energy Blues” as a bonus track on his live album, and then a few years later rejiggered that one as “California Recall Blues” and put it out as a free download online.

And of course, a number of his songs on actual BB or solo albums came from earlier attempts/versions. “And I Always Will” supposedly dates back to at least the BB ’85 sessions. “Don’t Fight the Sea” was started in 1978, had a bunch of recording done in 1989, and then finished off in the 2000s. There are of course other examples.

Let us also not forget that some time in the last several years, Al talked about re-re-recording “Runaway”, which of course he previously tried (and partially failed) to get going as a Beach Boys single as a live version in 1982.

As for “Waves of Love”, I think we’re seeing a convergence of two guys in Al and Larry Dvoskin that for whatever reason seem fixated on going back to the well for the same material over and over. I don’t know how many songs Dvoskin has actually written with Al (he appears to involved at least on the recording/production side of some other stuff like “Jenny Clover”), but he clearly feels “Waves of Love” is strong. He mentioned in an interview back around 2012 that, *his words*, Mike Love “c-ck-blocked” the song from being included on TWGMTR. Certainly, the song’s inclusion would have been a nice little infusion of royalties for Dvoskin that would outstrip sales of Al’s solo CD. But I think Dvoskin feels the song is strong. And I don’t disagree! It’s a good one, a nice solid song that works well as an Al song and certainly would have been just fine as a Beach Boys song. But I think the song is just about tapped out. As I said before, if Dvoskin is working an angle to like get the song in a movie trailer or a movie or TV show or something and needs to rejigger it, that would make sense. But if they’re doing all this work *in 2019* on the song *again*, and it’s just going to be plopped out there for release, and *especially* if they try to market it as a NEW single and ignore the 39 mixes we’ve already heard, then I think that would be a little excessive.

But I again reiterate that Al probably has DOZENS of songs, even outside of the BRI vaults, that we’ve never heard and are certainly worthy of hearing and releasing. Let’s see those. “Jenny Clover” isn’t bad; more of that would be nice.

Re: An Autobiography by Don Goldberg

$
0
0
Be interesting to get a real history of the band around this time. Carl's relationship with Bruce., Al's relationship with Carl at this time. So many things that we could learn from

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
I'll have to A/B this version of "Waves of Love" to the previous version. It sounds pretty similar. It's definitely the "saxophone/soundcheck" version found on the first pressing of the 2012 CD (the one with the buried Carl vocal), with possibly some mix variations.

The other two are cool to hear. "Jenny Clover" is another Al piano ballad in the mold of "And I Always Will." Al's voice sounds great; the song is okay. I have to give it more listens.

"Middle of Nowhere" very much *screams* NINETIES!!!!! This reminds me of what "Summer in Paradise" could have sounded like with better production. But yeah, it's very early-mid 90s. The closest comparison in the BB world I could think of is that it sounds a bit production-wise and style-wise like the 1997 "The Wilsons" album. Nice Matt lead and backing from Al. Very much sounds like an attempt at a "The Jardines" album.

I don't think either of these songs are as good as the best stuff on "Postcards", but they're nice to listen to and more indicators that Al probably has like 50 more tracks buried that we've never heard.

With all due respect, I just cannot see how you think what we are calling the saxophone version of "Waves of Love" the soundcheck recording. The entire thing seems much cleaner and more thought through than the other version. It has Carl's vocal couched in harmonies (improving it greatly) instead of standing alone, it has Al singing in a much more reasonable key, and just overall has a much more "considered" arrangement in my opinion.  It just sounds more 2010s than the other one. The other just kinda rides along with it's "Help Me Rhonda" type organ part and and sounds like something that woulda...for lack of a better phrase....something that woulda been recorded at a soundcheck.

Now perhaps I'm wrong, but I think that despite what I feel many on this board may think, it may have been backwards.

This back and forth seemed strangely familiar, and sure enough we had this same debate back in 2012 regarding the variations of this song. Which is totally fine and all in good fun.

To be clear, I don’t think any version of the song is purely a raw soundcheck performance. Every version has been sweetened/overdubbed, etc.

What I recall hearing back years ago was that “Waves of Love” began as something Al laid down during a soundcheck; this is presumably where Carl was present and added his vocal contribution. From there, varying amounts of additional overdubs were added to the different versions.

What I’m saying is that the “saxophone version”, meaning the version in the lower key and with Carl’s vocals buried in a stack of voices (the version included on the first US copies of the 2012 CD, and a variation of which is now on Dvoskin’s Soundcloud), sounds MUCH closer in *ambience* to what a soundcheck recording would sound like. Meaning, everything is wetter in the mix (more echo/reverb). The basic track elements of this version are the only thing in any version that sound plausibly like they could have been tracked during on on-stage soundcheck sort of setting. Even on this version, clearly more vocals have been overdubbed, with some stacked Al vocals being most obvious.

The second version (the version issued on the download version of the album back in 2012, and an alternate mix of which was also included on the Japanese SHM CD in 2012) sounds essentially *completely* re-recorded in a studio setting, with only Carl’s vocal from the other version flown in (and done so in a rather odd fashion, more on that in a moment). The key is different, and everything is dryer and punchier. The key is higher, so Al’s voice, while still sounding quite good, does sound a bit strained in places. Al’s vocal also sounds newer (meaning he sounds older), also suggesting the first “saxophone” version likely includes a 90s Al lead vocal while this second version includes an Al vocal cut probably in the late 2000s. It also sounds like what they did on this version is to extract Carl’s vocal from the vocal stack of the “first” version, and then isolate it and fit it into the higher key of the “second” version. This is why, to me, Carl’s more isolated vocal on this version has always sounded a bit odd.

Now, further complicating things is that I don’t think even Al or Dvoskin have been consistent on which version is *THE* version of the song they want to establish. When confusion first reigned back in 2012 when both versions were simultaneously released via CD and download respectively, I believe Al mentioned in an interview that it was the saxophone/CD version that was the “error” so to speak. That was the version they didn’t want to release, and it was in fact the second, higher key version issued as a download that was the “finished” version. Supporting that this was the case back in 2012 was that it was that second version that was issued later in 2012 on the Japanese SHM CD, along with an alternate mix of that same version. Also supporting this was that they kept this second version up as the download version of the song, and of course a digital download is something that can much more easily be fixed/replaced if something is in error, as opposed to CD pressings which are out there and obviously much harder to recall or replace.

Everything (other than the screw-up of releasing two vastly different versions happening in the first place) up to this point made sense to me. Regardless of which version one likes more (I like both, truly), that second, higher-key version certainly sounded like a more dense version with more going on, and sounded much more like a modern in-studio recording, and it was clearly attempting to more prominently feature Carl’s vocal contribution. And Al was seeming to establish *that* version as the go-to version. So it made sense that *that* version was the “final” or “finished” version that they were trying to establish.

The new alternate mix on Dvoskin’s Soundcloud is a variation of that “first” version, however. Now, we don’t know for sure which version Dvoskin and Al were very recently shown on Facebook “finishing up”, but I have a suspicion they have now gone back to that first saxophone “soundcheck” sounding version and are working with that one again. Which makes perfect sense only in that everything these guys seem to do with this song tends to make NO sense.

Ironically, I’d wager it’s quite possible whatever version Al and Dvoskin issue in the future is going to be yet *another* mix of one version or the other, which will mean we’ll likely be up to FIVE different mixes of this song.


Hey there HeyJude, I admit when I first read your response, I was once again somewhat like "argh, he just does not get it! How can he not hear what I'm hearing." But after truly reading through it again, I must say that I see what you're saying in here. I understand what you mean vis-à-vis Carl's vocal and how it was couched in harmonies when it was recorded, but then extracted and then possibly pitch shifted, which leaves us with the slightly wonky sounding version on what I'll call the "organ" version (to differentiate from the "sax" version). However, where I think we part is how we hear the tracks in question. The organ version to me sounds like an open air stage with the organ getting a natural room reverb and Al just kinda going for it in a key that doesn't quite work for him. However, one point that you bring up that may hadn't crossed my mind was that both of these versions have probably had significant overdubbed and vocal work. But I still stand by the fact that I think the opposite of you. But that's what makes this board interesting.

I suppose the easiest thing to do would be for one of us to contact Larry Dvoskin on Facebook or Twitter, and perhaps maybe I'll do that some time. He always has kinda seemed up to discuss The Beach Boys and his work with Al. In fact didn't he once say that "Waves of Love" was their Pet Sounds? Though who even knows. If we asked Al, I have a feeling that things would get even more complicated! He'd probably say it's an unreleased cut!

Re: Mike Love

$
0
0
Surprisingly legit.

Quote
On 25 February, the Maharishi held a party to celebrate Harrison's 25th birthday. The event included communal chanting,[143] a sitar performance by Harrison,[100] and a firework display.[156][157] The Maharishi gave Harrison an upside-down plastic globe of the world and said: "George, the globe I am giving you symbolizes the world today. I hope you will help us all in the task of putting it right."[158] Harrison turned the globe over and said "I've done it!", and the other students applauded.[159] For Love's birthday, on 15 March, members of the Beatles and Donovan performed "Spiritual Regeneration/Happy Birthday Mike Love", a song based on the Beach Boys' "Fun, Fun, Fun". Lennon presented Love with a round handmade card containing a self-portrait of him naked, and Harrison gave him a painting of Guru Dev.

The new Beach Boys shows are a spectacle

Re: The new Beach Boys shows are a spectacle

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
I saw the Mike and Bruce Beach Boys last night at the Ridgefield Playhouse Theater. This was the first time I've seen them since 2010, not counting the two C50 Mohegan Sun shows where I saw them with the reunited band. Growing up in the late 90s and early 2000s my parents took me to go see the Mike and Bruce Beach Boys a ton, but as I got older I gravitated more towards seeing Brian’s band and have pretty much stayed that way into adulthood. In a personal first for any concert experience, I decided to sign up for the VIP experience/package via Mike’s website. My main goal for the VIP experience was to have Mike and Bruce sign my Light-Up SMiLE Sessions box set since their autographs were the only ones I needed to complete it.

The VIP experience was good, but kind of odd due to the fact that the Ridgefield Playhouse Theater is a non-profit venue that mainly operates off of corporate sponsorships. I knew going in that the sponsors might alter the experience in some way. What I didn’t know was that the sponsors would be given their own private VIP experience during the ‘normal’/‘usual’ VIP time. The VIP experience was and is advertised on Mike’s website as lasting roughly an hour. Realistically this should actually manifest into something closer to a half hour of VIP time due to needing to receive VIP passes at the box office counter, Mike and Bruce needing to leave a little early in order to get ready for the show, etc. But last night the entire experience basically lasted about 10 minutes in total – the sponsors were let in to the VIP area separately from the ‘regular’ VIP group, and were then given a photo op with Mike and Bruce. For some reason, this photo op lasted about 25 minutes. I have no idea if each of the sponsors were given the chance to take separate/individual photos with Mike and Bruce, or if there was some other reason it took so long, but during that 25 minutes I and the four other people who had VIP passes had to wait outside in the concert hall until it was over.

I am not complaining – like I said, I knew going in that the sponsors would likely alter the experience in some way, shape, or form. And in some ways having a shorter meet and greet session is advantageous – it takes some of the social pressure away from the experience, which is nice. I am just pointing this out in case anyone is thinking about buying a VIP package for a venue like this, and who may be primarily interested in it for the social experience.

But the actual experience of meeting Mike and Bruce was great. Bruce signed the box set first. He asked me where I wanted him to sign it, and when I told him to sign underneath Brian’s signature, he called Brian his idol, to which I replied “mine too”. He then asked me if I own the Good Vibrations box set, and when I told him I did, he said to listen to disc 2 of that box set to hear where Brian was aiming to go with the SMiLE music. Mike then came over and added his autograph to it. He didn’t say much to me directly, but he was kind enough to also autograph my VIP Laminate, which was a nice gesture since the staff there were very explicit that Mike and Bruce would only sign one item as part of the VIP meet and greet session. So he didn’t have to do that, but he did so anyway. I really appreciated that.

After they finished autographing everyone’s items, Mike and Bruce then took photos with the VIPers. There was a young couple who got their photograph first, and then when my turn came Bruce noticed my sweatshirt and complimented me on it. He said “Where on earth did you get that? That’s fantastic!” Mike took notice of it and seemed to like it too. On the way out of the VIP meet and greet area as I was walking back to the theater, I ran into Scott Totten who also noticed the hoodie and complimented me on it, saying “now that’s dedication!”.

The show itself was great. Based this on some recent things I’ve read and on some of my previous experiences seeing Mike and Bruce back in the day, I was kind of skeptical that the show would be great, but I came away extremely impressed, so much so that I wouldn’t hesitate to see them again the next time they’re playing close by. Everyone was in good voice, but the person who impressed me the most was Bruce. His vocals were pretty weak when I last heard him sing live in 2012 and 2010, but last night his vocals were actually a highlight, maybe even the highlight of the night.

Rob was still filling in for Brian Eichenberger (who Mike mentioned is currently on paternity leave) and his vocals were much stronger this time around than when I saw him on Brian’s Christmas tour. In one of my posts in Brian’s 2018 tour thread, I complimented the sound of Rob’s voice, which to me sounds more like a young Brian Wilson than Matt Jardine’s voice does, but I criticized Rob’s falsetto for lacking power. Last night there was a lot more power behind his voice, and I thought he was fantastic. The setlist was good; they performed California Dreamin’, Good to My Baby, and You’re So Good To Me, which are three songs I wasn’t expecting them to do. On the other hand, they didn’t perform Darlin’ or Heroes and Villains. I know they don’t consistently perform Heroes and Villains in concert, but the lack of Darlin’ in the setlist was surprising. And they did perform some songs off of 12 Sides of Summer of course. The only song I thought sounded very out of place was Pisces Brothers – I know this has been discussed here before, but it really halted the momentum of the concert when it was performed. I can tell it is a very personal song for Mike, but that is the only song performed last night that I would argue should be left out of the setlist moving forward.

Here are some pictures from the concert, the VIP meet and greet, and my now fully completed/autographed Light-Up SMiLE Sessions box set:











Quick question, what time did the meet and greet start before the show? I'm supposed to have one this weekend but i'm not sure when I need to leave as i'm driving 2 hours or so?

Re: Beach Boys 2019 Tour Thread

$
0
0
Quick question, what time did the meet and greet start before the show? I'm supposed to have one this weekend but i'm not sure when I need to leave as i'm driving 2 hours or so?

It was advertised as starting 1 hour before showtime. For the Ridgefield Playhouse Theater this meant 6 PM (the show started at 7 PM), which was also the time that the doors to the venue were opened. According to the ushers/staff there though, the actual meet and greet was supposed to start at 6:15 PM, although it ultimately got delayed even further in my case.

Re: 1998/1999 unreleased Al Jardine album

$
0
0
Hey there HeyJude, I admit when I first read your response, I was once again somewhat like "argh, he just does not get it! How can he not hear what I'm hearing." But after truly reading through it again, I must say that I see what you're saying in here. I understand what you mean vis-à-vis Carl's vocal and how it was couched in harmonies when it was recorded, but then extracted and then possibly pitch shifted, which leaves us with the slightly wonky sounding version on what I'll call the "organ" version (to differentiate from the "sax" version). However, where I think we part is how we hear the tracks in question. The organ version to me sounds like an open air stage with the organ getting a natural room reverb and Al just kinda going for it in a key that doesn't quite work for him. However, one point that you bring up that may hadn't crossed my mind was that both of these versions have probably had significant overdubbed and vocal work. But I still stand by the fact that I think the opposite of you. But that's what makes this board interesting.

I suppose the easiest thing to do would be for one of us to contact Larry Dvoskin on Facebook or Twitter, and perhaps maybe I'll do that some time. He always has kinda seemed up to discuss The Beach Boys and his work with Al. In fact didn't he once say that "Waves of Love" was their Pet Sounds? Though who even knows. If we asked Al, I have a feeling that things would get even more complicated! He'd probably say it's an unreleased cut!

I think all of the versions of this track have been sufficiently reworked to where it’s impossible to know anything for sure. The fact that they’ve clearly issued multiple versions (and multiple mixes of each of those versions) only muddies the waters even more. That they issued some of the variations seemingly *accidentally* makes it even *more* confusing! That they then, seven years later, reissued the album for streaming *without* the song at all makes it even further perplexing. Then, a random alternate mix is just floating around on Soundcloud for months with nobody noticing. Then, Dvoskin is posting on Facebook about “finally finishing” a song that has already had three or four variations put out there, and discusses it under an alternate title and speaks as if the song has never been issued before. It’s all pretty screwy.

That being said, beyond all of the things I mentioned before pointing to that “First CD/Saxophone” version as sounding much closer to a soundcheck iteration, I will also say this:

That second “organ” version, the “download” version in the higher key, sounds ZERO like anything the mid-1990s touring band could have recorded on stage. I’m well versed in what the various touring bands sounded like, the style and capabilities of the musicians, and what any “board” recording of that lineup would sound like. There’s nothing on that “organ” version that sounds like it was recorded by the circa 1995 touring band. They may have brought some of those guys back in to the studio at a later date to do some of that guitar and other work. I can’t rule out that *something* on that organ version (besides Carl’s lead) was flown in from the original soundcheck recording. Maybe Meros did some on-stage B3 work or something that was copied and pasted. But because the two versions are in different keys, this seems unlikely. But I’d say that 95+ percent of what is heard on that “organ” version couldn’t have possibly been recorded on-stage during a soundcheck by the touring band in the 90s. The track is way too adorned. The guitar work sounds tight and punchy. Pretty much *everything* on this version sounds dry and quite direct. There’s no way the guitars on that version were done live on stage by Al, Carl, and Ed Carter. I don’t think Carl even gets a guitar credit on the song. Of course, the credits for the song are potentially non-sensical as well, because they seem incomplete and it’s unclear which version they pertain to. But the credits I recall not only mention several of the touring band members, but also Dvoskin on keyboards and Dan Knutson on guitar, and I don’t think either of those guys were on stage. If the song *otherwise* had any ambience like what I know the touring band sounded like at that time, then maybe I’d buy that the “organ” version is a soundcheck recording with a few overdubs. But to me, it very much sounds like a studio re-record with a few elements, mainly Carl’s voice, flown in from the old original soundcheck recording.

Here's what I would guess happened.

At a gig in the 1993-1996 time frame (apparently at the Merv Griffin resort in Altantic City), Al spent some time with the touring band at soundcheck noodling on a new song he had written with Dvoskin, “Waves of Love.” As far as I can tell, given the sort of assembly line, autopilot nature of the touring band in that era, it probably *wasn’t* super common to spend any significant amount of time during soundchecks working out *new* material, especially in the era when they weren’t actively pursuing recording a new album. But maybe they were doing a bit more in the way of rehearsals and soundcheck, and so they tried out this Al tune. Apparently, Mike and Bruce aren’t even on it, meaning either they weren’t even on stage when the track was cut, or any of their contributions were wiped. I’m guessing a lineup of Al, Carl, Matt along with Meros, Kowalski, Carter, and Cannata (not sure where Billy Hinsche plays into this) attempted the song. Al had these attempts recorded, whether for demo/reference purposes or because, maybe, he thought they could really use this as a spring board for a “finished” version?

At some point, and I don’t know if this was very soon after, or some point later in the 90s, or way later, some overdubs were added to this version. Most notably, stacked Al vocals were added at some point (the “dit dit dit” sort of stuff). We can also hear an accordion-type instrument, most prominently on this recent mix that surfaced on Dvoskin’s Soundcloud.

At some stage, *this* version, what I guess we’re calling the “Saxophone” version, must have been the one Al was considering for release on some iteration of his “Postcards” album. They clearly prepped (and possibly did further overdubs on) this version in the 2010-2012 timeframe for potential release as a bonus track on the 2012 “Postcards” reissue/wide release.

At some point, either before, concurrent, or after that first version was noodled with, they seem to have tried a completely different version of the song. The key was changed (higher), and it sounds like they basically attempted to give a higher energy, punchier sound by upping the key, the tempo, and adding slightly crunchy guitars and recording everything pretty dry and up-front. They even added slide guitar. They also of course re-arranged the song itself in terms of the order of the verses and choruses. It seems, though, that they when they did this new version, they still wanted to integrate Carl’s vocal. I’d have to listen to both versions and try to sort of mentally isolate Carl’s voice in the harmony stack of that first version to hear if Carl’s voice is in the same key on both versions. They either altered the pitch on Carl’s voice for this new version, or they essentially pulled Carl’s voice out of the vocal stack heard on that first version and then determined what key a new recording would or could be in so that Carl’s isolated voice could serve now as a lead for that chorus portion of the song. Carl’s voice sounds kind of strange on this version, and I think that’s due both to plucking his voice out of a harmony stack, and then also having someone (Matt?) double Carl’s voice, making it sound simultaneously *more* isolated yet also somewhat indistinct or unclear.

When it came time to do the 2012 reissue/wide release of “Postcards”, I think their intention was to release this second “organ” punchy version. Somehow, while this version was included on digital copies of the album, the first “saxophone” version was put on the CD. How they got this incorrect version on a master, presumably had proofs/test pressings made, and then the thing had presumably thousands of copies replicated, I have no idea. Typical Beach Boys stuff though.

When the song was finally issued in 2012, Al often highlighted Carl’s voice being on the track. I think this is noteworthy as well, as Carl’s voice is  *much* more to the fore and discernable on that second “organ” version of the song. Carl is essentially only a backing vocalist on the first “sax” version. I don’t think the vocal Carl turned in was likely anything other than a quick rattled off thing done to help Al demo a song at a soundcheck. Thus, especially when isolated away from the harmony stack, Carl’s vocal sounds just kind of weird and tentative and wonky. I’ve always wondered if this was one of the many possible reasons nobody wanted to work on this thing in 2012 for the BBs reunion album.
Viewing all 49813 articles
Browse latest View live